*22:9 Some 10% of the Greek manuscripts omit ‘and were afraid’ (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
†22:11 But they too had been in that light, so the blindness was a judgment applied specifically to Paul (Saul).
‡22:12 Paul is establishing the credibility of Ananias as a witness, since he will attest that it was ‘the God of our fathers’ who was dealing with Paul (Saul). Some 25% of the Greek manuscripts omit ‘in Damascus’, as in most versions.
§22:14 Jesus had identified Himself as ‘Jesus’ on the road, and was obviously supernatural. Here Ananias confirms that Saul saw the Messiah (‘the Natsorean’), and adds that all is under the Father's direction. Saul was chosen to be a worldwide witness; indeed, through his letters he continues to be one!
*22:16 By invoking the Lord he was placing himself under His direction and protection, which was what took care of his sins, not the baptism. There probably was not enough water in the house for a complete bath, in any case, so the baptism was by aspersion (as it was in the house of Cornelius, the house of the Philippian jailor, etc. etc.). Instead of ‘of the Lord’, some 6% of the Greek manuscripts read ‘his’ (as in NIV, NASB, TEV, etc.).
†22:18 This is the only record we have of this encounter. Perhaps Paul is reinforcing that his going to the Gentiles was at God's insistence. I wonder if Luke wasn't in that crowd, and close enough to hear what went on.
‡22:19 I follow the best line of transmission in reading “into”, albeit with only 20% of the Greek manuscripts here. Almost all versions follow the 80% in reading ‘upon’.
§22:20 Some 2.3% of the Greek manuscripts, of inferior quality, omit ‘to his murder’ (as in NIV, NASB, LB, etc.).
*22:24 Poor commander! He presumably did not understand Hebrew, so Paul's speech meant nothing to him. But he saw that the mob listened quietly, and then suddenly erupted! He had already tried to get an answer from the mob, without success. He doubtless did not understand the Jewish mindset either, so by Roman logic Paul must have done something pretty awful to provoke such a violent reaction. So by proper Roman procedure, he orders a flogging.
†22:26 Perhaps 5% of the Greek manuscripts omit “Consider” (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
‡22:28 He was not just making conversation; he was trying to be sure that Paul was not lying.
§22:29 Perhaps the reference is to the ‘when’ and ‘how’ they were first used, since chains became part of Paul's life.
*22:30 Some 10% of the Greek manuscripts omit ‘from the bonds’ (as in NIV and NASB).