*4:2 γινωσκεται f35 [67%] RP,HF,CP ¦ γινωσκετε A,B,C [25%] OC,TR,NU ¦ γινωσκομεν ℵ [8%] (Since most versions are based on TR or NU, we are used to the 2nd person, which may have contributed to the use of this passage as a ‘litmus’ test for demonization.)
†4:3 ομολογει f35 ℵ (73.5%) RP,HF,CP ¦ 1 τον A,B (24.2%) OC,TR,NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ one other variant (0.2%)
‡4:3 χριστον f35 (91.4%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (6%) NU ¦ κυριον ℵ (alone) ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ two other variants (0.4%)
§4:3 εν σαρκι εληλυθοτα f35 ℵ (94.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (2.6%) NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ three other variants (0.6%)
*4:3 εκ rell ¦ — [30%]
†4:9 ο θεος rell ¦ — [15%]
‡4:10 ηγαπησαμεν f35 A [98.2%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ηγαπηκαμεν B [1.6%] NU ¦ ηγαπησεν ℵ
§4:12 τετελειωμενη εστιν εν ημιν f35 (90.7%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 3412 A (7.9%) NU ¦ ~ 1342 ℵB (0.8%) ¦ three other variants (0.6%)
*4:15 αν f35 ℵ,A [92.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ εαν B [7.5%] NU
†4:15 ομολογηση rell ¦ ομολογησει [16%] ¦ ολολογη A [1%] ¦ ομολογει [1%]
‡4:16 αυτω f35 A [37%] OC,TR ¦ 1 μενει ℵB [63%] RP,HF,CP,NU (Since the repetition of the verb is unnecessary, does it become the harder reading?)
§4:17 εχωμεν rell ¦ εχομεν ℵ [12%] ¦ σχωμεν [1%]
*4:19 αυτον f35 [84%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B [2.6%] NU ¦ τον θεον ℵ048 [13.4%]
†4:19 πρωτος rell ¦ πρωτον [15%]
‡4:20 μισει f35 048 [74%] ¦ μιση ℵA,B [26%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (The point of the argument hinges on the hating being fact, so the Indicative is correct.)
§4:20 αυτου rell ¦ — [1%] OC
*4:20 πως f35 A,048 (95.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ου ℵB (4.2%) NU