*3:2 ανεπιληπτον f35 [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ανεπιλημπτον ℵA [3%] NU
†3:2 νηφαλιον f35 ℵA [40%] OC,CP,NU ¦ νηφαλεον [50%] RP,HF,TR ¦ νηφαλαιον [8%] ¦ νηφαλειον [2%]
‡3:3 μη αισχροκερδη f35 (69.9%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA (30.1%) NU (Who wants to offend those with the means to make substantial contributions to the church coffers? So why talk about shady dealings? The omission is surely inferior.)
§3:3 αλλ f35 [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ αλλα ℵA [3%] NU
*3:7 αυτον f35 [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,I [3%] NU
†3:11 νηφαλιους f35 ℵA,C [40%] OC,CP,NU ¦ νηφαλεους [50%] RP,HF,TR ¦ νηφαλαιους [8%] ¦ νηφαλεας [2%]
‡3:14 ταχιον f35 ℵ (92.5%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ταχειον (5.4%) ¦ εν ταχει A,C (2%) NU
§3:15 ἑδραιωμα rell ¦ εδραιωμα [15%]
*3:16 θεος f35 A,Cv [98.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ος ℵ [1%] NU ¦ ο D ¦ ω 061 ¦ ος θεος 256 (For an explanation of this statement of evidence, and a discussion of the implications, please see my book, ‘The Identity of the New Testament Text IV, footnote 3, on pages 115-117’) [The variant chosen by NU is a grammatical impossibility (no antecedent for the pronoun), besides being a stupidity. What is a ‘mystery’ about any human male being manifested in flesh? All human beings have bodies. In the absence of concrete evidence, the claim that this is a quote lifted from a known hymn or poem becomes no more than a desperate attempt to ‘save’ a choice that besides being stupid is also perverse (because of the theological consequences).]
†3:16 ανεληφθη f35 [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ανελημφθη ℵA,C [3%] NU