2) ειπεν τε προς αυτους (61.6%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ειπεν δε προς αυτους (5.1%) ¦ ειπεν προς αυτους (1.1%)
3) ο δε ειπεν ℵA (3.6%) ¦ ο δε ειπεν αυτοις (4%) ¦ ο δε παυλος προς αυτους 𝕻38
At issue is a minor question of taste or style. The second set of three gives the complete formula, the first gives a shortened form. We observe that in verse 2 there is a complete exchange between Paul and the group of disciples, and the full introductory formula is used for both. In verse 3 there is a second complete exchange, wherein the second introductory formula is short—should not the first introductory formula also be short, to match it? That would seem to make for better style. But the attestation for the long form is fairly strong, 67.8% vs 24.5%. Presumably the contenders are the first variants in 1) and 2), so τε wins over δε. I consider that the first variant in 1) really is the better reading, as well as being attested by f35. «Εἰς τί οὖν ἐβαπτίσθητε;» Οἱ δὲ εἶπον,§ ειπον rell ¦ ειπαν ℵA,B [2%] NU «Εἰς τὸ Ἰωάννου βάπτισμα.» 4 Εἶπεν δὲ* δε rell ¦ τε [45%] Παῦλος, «Ἰωάννης μὲν† μεν f35 [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,D [4%] NU ἐβάπτισεν βάπτισμα μετανοίας, τῷ λαῷ λέγων εἰς τὸν ἐρχόμενον μετ᾿ αὐτὸν ἵνα πιστεύσωσιν, τοῦτ᾿ ἔστιν, εἰς τὸν Χριστόν,‡ χριστον f35 (D) [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B [4%] NU Ἰησοῦν.»§ χριστον ιησουν rell ¦ ~ 21 OC 5 Ἀκούσαντες δὲ ἐβαπτίσθησαν εἰς τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Κυρίου Ἰησοῦ. 6 Καὶ ἐπιθέντος αὐτοῖς τοῦ Παύλου τὰς* τας f35 [55%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP[NU] ¦ — ℵA,B(D) [45%] χεῖρας ἦλθεν τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ Ἅγιον ἐπ᾿ αὐτούς, ἐλάλουν τε γλώσσαις καὶ προεφήτευον.† προεφητευον f35 [93%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ επροφητευον ℵA,B,D [7%] NU 7 Ἦσαν δὲ οἱ πάντες ἄνδρες ὡσεὶ δεκαδύο.‡ δεκαδυο f35 [94%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ δωδεκα ℵA,B,D [6%] NU
*19:1 ελθειν f35 B [92%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ κατελθειν (ℵ)A [4%] [NU] ¦ ερχεται D ¦ two other variants [4%]
†19:1 ευρων f35 D [85.5%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ευρον [9%] ¦ ευρειν A,B (5.5%) NU ¦ ευριν ℵ
‡19:1 τινας μαθητας rell ¦ ~ 21 OC
§19:2 ειπεν f35 D (94.7%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 τε ℵA,B (3.6%) NU ¦ 1 δε (1.7%)
*19:2 ειπον f35 [95%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,D [5%] NU
†19:2 ουδε f35 (D) [98%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ουδ ℵA,B [2%] NU
‡19:3 1) ειπεν τε f35 B (18.3%) NU ¦ ειπεν δε D (4.5%) ¦ ειπεν ουν (1.7%) 2) ειπεν τε προς αυτους (61.6%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ειπεν δε προς αυτους (5.1%) ¦ ειπεν προς αυτους (1.1%) 3) ο δε ειπεν ℵA (3.6%) ¦ ο δε ειπεν αυτοις (4%) ¦ ο δε παυλος προς αυτους 𝕻38At issue is a minor question of taste or style. The second set of three gives the complete formula, the first gives a shortened form. We observe that in verse 2 there is a complete exchange between Paul and the group of disciples, and the full introductory formula is used for both. In verse 3 there is a second complete exchange, wherein the second introductory formula is short—should not the first introductory formula also be short, to match it? That would seem to make for better style. But the attestation for the long form is fairly strong, 67.8% vs 24.5%. Presumably the contenders are the first variants in 1) and 2), so τε wins over δε. I consider that the first variant in 1) really is the better reading, as well as being attested by f35.
§19:3 ειπον rell ¦ ειπαν ℵA,B [2%] NU
*19:4 δε rell ¦ τε [45%]
†19:4 μεν f35 [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,D [4%] NU
‡19:4 χριστον f35 (D) [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B [4%] NU
§19:4 χριστον ιησουν rell ¦ ~ 21 OC
*19:6 τας f35 [55%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP[NU] ¦ — ℵA,B(D) [45%]
†19:6 προεφητευον f35 [93%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ επροφητευον ℵA,B,D [7%] NU
‡19:7 δεκαδυο f35 [94%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ δωδεκα ℵA,B,D [6%] NU
§19:8 τα f35 ℵA [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP[NU] ¦ — B,D [4%]
*19:9 τινος f35 (D) [97%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B [3%] NU
†19:10 ιησου f35 [87%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B(D) [13%] NU
‡19:11 δε f35 D [22%] ¦ τε ℵA,B [78%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP,NU
§19:11 εποιει ο θεος f35 [95%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 231 ℵA,B,D [5%] NU
*19:12 επιφερεσθαι f35 D [90%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ αποφερεσθαι ℵA,B [5%] NU ¦ two other variants [5%]
†19:12 απαλλασσεσθαι rell ¦ απαλλασεσθαι B [15%] ¦ at least six further spellings
‡19:12 εξερχεσθαι απ αυτων f35 [88%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ εκπορευεσθαι ℵA,B,D [7%] NU ¦ 1 [5%]
§19:13 επεχειρησαν rell ¦ επεχειρισαν [3%] CP ¦ επεχιρησαν ℵ
*19:13 απο f35 [55%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ και ℵA,B [5%] NU ¦ και 1 [40%] ¦ εκ D
†19:13 ορκιζομεν f35 [90%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ορκιζω ℵA,B,D [3%] NU ¦ ορκιζωμεν [1%] ¦ εξορκιζομεν [5%] ¦ — [1%]
‡19:13 ο f35 [35%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,D [65%] NU
§19:14 τινες f35 ℵA (95.8%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ τινος [𝕻38]B[D] (4%) NU ¦ — 𝕻38 and D have a long addition ¦ one other variant
*19:14 υιοι σκευα ιουδαιου αρχιερεως επτα f35 (91%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 23451 ℵ(A)B (8.5%) NU ¦ — 𝕻38 and D are wild
†19:14 οι f35 (95%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B (4.7%) NU ¦ — 𝕻38 and D are wild
‡19:15 ειπεν f35 [93%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 αυτοις ℵA,B,D [7%] NU
§19:15 τον f35 ℵA,D [97%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 μεν B [3%] [NU]
*19:16 εφαλλομενος f35 [94%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ εφαλομενος ℵA,B [5%] NU ¦ εναλλομενος D ¦ two other variants [1%]
†19:16 επ αυτους ο ανθρωπος f35 (D) [93%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 3412 ℵA,B [5%] NU ¦ 34 [2%]
‡19:16 και f35 ℵ [95%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B(D) [5%] NU
§19:16 κατακυριευσαν f35 A [80%] HF,RP,CP ¦ κατακυριευσας ℵB [18%] OC,TR,NU ¦ κυριευσας D [1%] ¦ κατεκυριευσεν [1%]
*19:16 αυτων f35 [90%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ αμφοτερων ℵA,B,D [5%] NU ¦ two other variants [5%]
†19:17 εγενετο πασιν γνωστον f35 [20%] ¦ ~ 132 ℵA,B,D [75%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ ~ 312 [5%]
‡19:18 αναγγελλοντες rell ¦ αναγγελοντες [18%] ¦ one other variant
§19:19 συνεψηφισαντο f35 [20%] ¦ συνεψηφισαν ℵA,B(D) [67%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ συνεψηφησαν [12%] ¦ two other variants [1%]
*19:20 ο λογος του κυριου f35 [97%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 3412 ℵA,B [1%] NU ¦ 123 θεου [2%] ¦ 3 θεου D
†19:21 διελθων rell ¦ διελθειν A,D [20%] ¦ one other variant
‡19:21 ιερουσαλημ f35 [92%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ιεροσολυμα ℵA,B(D) [8%] NU
§19:24 εργασιαν ουκ ολιγην f35 [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 231 (ℵ)A,B,D [4%] NU
*19:25 ημων f35 [93%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ημιν ℵA,B(D) [7%] NU
†19:26 γινομενοι rell ¦ γενομενοι D [15%] ¦ γεινομενοι B ¦ three other variants
‡19:27 αρτεμιδος ιερον f35 ℵA,B [25%] OC,TR,NU ¦ ~ 21 D [75%] HF,RP,CP
§19:27 ουδεν f35 D [40%] TR ¦ ουθεν ℵA,B [60%] HF,RP,OC,CP,NU
*19:27 δε f35 [88%] HF,RP,TR,CP ¦ τε ℵA,B [10%] OC,NU ¦ — D [2%]
†19:27 την μεγαλειοτητα f35 [95%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ της μεγαλειοτητος (ℵ)A,B [5%] NU ¦ — D
‡19:28 πληρεις rell ¦ πληρης A [20%] ¦ πληρις ℵ [1%]
§19:29 ολη f35 (D) [92%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B [8%] NU
*19:29 της f35 ℵA,B [95%] HF,RP,OC,NU ¦ — (D) [5%] TR,CP
†19:29 συνεκδημους rell ¦ 1 του [5%] TR
‡19:30 του δε παυλου f35 [95%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 32 ℵA,B [3%] NU ¦ ~ 132 [1%] ¦ ~ 213 (D)
§19:32 ενεκεν f35 D [97%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ενεκα ℵA,B [3%] NU
*19:33 προεβιβασαν f35 [96%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ συνεβιβασαν ℵA,B [4%] NU ¦ κατεβιβασαν D
†19:33 προβαλλοντων f35 D [65%] OC,CP ¦ προβαλοντων ℵA,B [35%] HF,RP,TR,NU
‡19:34 επιγνοντες f35 ℵA,B [70%] HF,RP,OC,CP,NU ¦ επιγνοντων [5%] TR ¦ επιγνωντες [25%]
§19:35 ανθρωπος f35 D [92%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ανθρωπων ℵA,B [8%] NU
*19:35 νεωκορον rell ¦ νεοκορον [25%] ¦ ναοκορον D
†19:35 θεας f35 [94%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,D [6%] NU
‡19:36 πρασσειν rell ¦ πραττειν [10%] TR ¦ πρασσιν ℵ ¦ two other variants
§19:37 θεον rell ¦ θεαν D [15%] OC,TR
*19:37 υμων f35 [90%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ ημων ℵA,B,D [10%] NU
†19:38 εχουσιν προς τινα λογον f35 ℵA,B [95%] HF,RP,OC,CP,NU ¦ ~ 2341 [5%] TR
‡19:38 εγκαλειτωσαν rell ¦ εγκαλητωσαν [20%] ¦ εγκαλιτωσαν D [1%]
§19:39 περι ετερων f35 ℵA,D (92.7%) HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ περαιτερω B (4.7%) NU ¦ περετερω (1.1%) ¦ περετερον (0.6%) ¦ three other variants (0.9%)
*19:39 επιζητειτε rell ¦ επιζητειται ℵ [13%] ¦ ζητειτε [2%] ¦ one other variant
†19:40 ου f35 ℵA,B [90%] HF,RP,CP[NU] ¦ — D [10%] OC,TR
‡19:40 αποδουναι f35 ℵA,B,D [20%] OC,TR,NU ¦ δουναι [80%] HF,RP,CP ¦ two other variants
§19:40 λογον f35 D [93%] HF,RP,OC,TR,CP ¦ 1 περι ℵA,B [7%] NU